What is ADHD, really?

ByDr. Berney

What is ADHD, really?

A few days ago, I was working with a mother who was concerned that her son had ADHD (Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder).  She said that she knows “a little” about ADHD, but was not sure if ADHD explained some of the difficulties that her son was experiencing at home and at school.  So, I thought that I would write a little about what ADHD is and, most importantly, what it is NOT.

Here is a little history about ADHD before we discuss what it is.  ADHD is the newest label of a disorder that has been around for a long time.  It has had many different names and children with impulsivity and restlessness was described in writings since at least the 1700’s.  Prior to the 1960’s, many physicians believed that children with inattention, overactivity, impulsivity, and learning difficulties experienced some type of mild encephalopathy (which basically means a disease in the brain).   They said “mild,” because these people, usually kids, had average to above average intelligence and were not “severely” impaired. Further, there were no true clinical findings of brain damage.  As time passed, it became problematic to “suppose” that there was brain damage in these people.  Therefore, in the late 1960’s, things began to change when several labels began to emerge to describe this condition.  Clinicians began using labels such as “Minimal Brain Dysfunction,” or MDB, and “Hyperkinetic Reaction of Childhood” to diagnose individuals with average or above average IQ who experienced behavioral and learning difficulties.  In the mid to late 1970’s, however, the label changed yet again.  Around that time, there was a great deal of education reform occurring in the US.  In fact, it was not until the mid 1970’s that laws were passed that required public schools to educate all children (remember that, prior to these laws, many children were not educated in schools).  The passing of these laws necessitated a method for identifying children who had difficulties learning.  It was at that time that learning disabilities were first truly identified.  At the same time, the American Psychiatric Association was redefining “Hyperkinetic Reaction of Childhood” and first used the label “Attention Deficit Disorder with or without Hyperactivity.”  As the education system defined learning disabilities, and the American Psychiatric Association defined ADD, the group of children previously diagnosed with MBD or Hyperkinetic Reaction of Childhood were split into one of the two groups, ADD or learning disabled, based upon their symptoms.  ADD with or without Hyperactivity (which was typically abbreviated as ADD/H) was, again, relabeled in 1987, when the American Psychiatric Association referred to it as ADHD (Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder).  ADHD has been the title used for this condition since that time.  ADHD has been around for a long time and has had many aliases over the years.

So, what makes up a diagnosis of ADHD?  Well, you can Google (or Bing) “ADHD diagnosis” and have millions of hits (I just Googled it and got 3,870,000).  Many of those hits will give you the criteria that professionals use to make the diagnosis.  Therefore, to reduce repetition, I will just give you a summary.  There are three subtypes of ADHD: Predominantly Inattentive Type, Predominantly Hyperactive/Impulsive Type, and Combined Type.  The inattentive type suggests that the person has multiple symptoms of inattention.  Typical symptoms of inattention include difficulty focusing, making careless mistakes, forgetfulness, misplacing things, etc.  To meet criteria, a person has to have at least 6 symptoms of inattention (as defined in the criteria).   The hyperactive/impulsive type suggests that the person has multiple symptoms of overactivity and impulsivity.  Typical symptoms include acting as if “driven by a motor,” difficulty sitting still, fidgetiness, interrupting others, and acting without considering the consequences.  To meet criteria for the hyperactive/impulsive type, a person must have 6 symptoms, as defined by the criteria.  If a person must have 6 inattentive symptoms AND 6 hyperactive/impulsive symptoms, then they meet criteria for ADHD, Combined type.

While the symptoms mentioned above are the primary behaviors of ADHD, there are several other things that have to be present before a true diagnosis of ADHD can be made.  First, there must be symptoms prior to the age of 7 years.  A person, based upon the current diagnostic criteria made by the American Psychiatric Association, cannot be diagnosed with ADHD unless symptoms were present early in life.  This, of course, creates some questions related to “Adult Onset ADHD.”  It is certainly possible that a person can make it through their childhood and adolescence without being diagnosed as ADHD, only to be diagnosed with ADHD as an adult.  However, to accurately make the diagnosis, the adult must report symptoms that existed before the age of 7.  This creates some challenges, as there are many conditions that create inattention and forgetfulness that are not ADHD (i.e., depression and anxiety).  Therefore, accurately diagnosing ADHD in adults is somewhat challenging.

The issue of age creates a similar problem when trying to diagnose children.  It is becoming more common that I will have parents bring young children, 3-5 years old, to my office for an ADHD evaluation.  I often resist making a diagnosis of ADHD in individuals that young, though there are some children who obviously have difficulties.  For the remaining young children, however, ADHD-like symptoms is a way of life.  Have you ever seen a kindergarten classroom?  I am awed by those teachers!  They must frequently change activities, keep the children engaged, and be entertaining for 7 and a half hours a day.  Why?  Because most of those children would easily lose their attention to task and become overactive if they were not constantly stimulated.  It is not until children are 8 or 9 years old that we expect them to have calmed down and have the ability to focus on a task for more than a few minutes.  Isn’t it interesting that it is around that time (2 and 3 grade) that we expect kids to be able to read chapter books and answer questions about what they have read?  It is because most of them are not able to focus long enough until they are that old.  It does not mean that they had ADHD!

The second issue that must be addressed before an accurate diagnosis of ADHD can be made is the need for the individual to have symptom related problems in more than one setting.  The majority of patients that I see are self-referred.  That means that they were not referred by another professional or by the school.  In children, that means that I am seeing them because their parents feel as though there is a problem.  I have often begun an ADHD evaluation with a child, only to find that the teacher has no concerns with the child’s behavior.  The teacher indicates that the child can sit and focus, attend to task, and never gets into trouble for being out of his seat.  Situations such as this rarely qualifies a child as being ADHD.  Think about it this way.  If a child has ADHD, it means that they CANNOT focus and attend.  They have significant difficulty sitting still and resisting impulsive responses.  If these are things that they CANNOT do, how is it that they can do it at school if they really have ADHD?  The answer, they do not really have ADHD.  Now I should note that I said it “rarely” qualifies for a diagnosis of ADHD.  There are times when a fabulous teacher (there are a lot of them out there) is able to create a classroom setting that effectively manages children with mild ADHD.  So, of course, this must be taken into consideration.  Nonetheless, 9 times out of 10, if a child has behavioral issues at home, and there are no issues at school, it is not ADHD.  It is something else.

The other scenario is when the child has problems at school and no issues at home.  This one is a little more challenging.  Sometimes children do not have any problems at home because there are no demands placed upon them.  They do not have chores or homework.  They do not have to do things that they do not want to do.  In these situations, ADHD is still a possibility and further testing is needed.

This brings me to the last section to discuss, testing for ADHD.  Today, ADHD is a condition that is diagnosed based upon clinical findings.  Although there are researchers searching for some type of laboratory test to identify ADHD, it remains that the only way to test for ADHD is through neuropsychological testing and observations.  In my clinic, I perform multiple tests to assess intellectual ability, academic achievement, executive functioning (a big topic I will discuss in a different thread. Just note here that ADHD is considered a disorder of executive function), and attention.  In addition, I provide forms to parents and teachers to complete to assess ADHD behaviors at home and at school.  For adults, I perform a similar battery of tests and provide them with self-report questionnaires (questionnaires that they fill out about themselves) and encourage them to have one of their parents help them complete a questionnaire that asks about their childhood.

ADHD is the most common psychological/psychiatric diagnosis made in children.  Further, I believe that the number of ADHD diagnoses will continue to rise.  Though I will save it for a different post, I believe that there are many things happening in education these days that are “causing” ADHD symptoms in children.  As educational expectations rise, and fourth grade students continue to be asked to learn algebra and geometry, students are going to have ever more difficulty focusing and concentrating in school.  Behavioral issues will continue to rise, not because more kids have ADHD, but because we are creating a setting that is not appropriate for them, developmentally.  At many schools, kids can’t even talk at lunch any more!  Wow, I will save that soap box for later …

About the author

Dr. Berney administrator

9 Comments so far

adhd in children questionnaire | ADHDPosted on4:09 pm - Jan 4, 2010

[…] The Mental Breakdown » Blog Archive » What is ADHD, really? […]

RodPosted on6:09 am - Jan 10, 2010

I was diagnosed with ADHD as an adult, along with a reading, writing, and math disability. Clearly, ADHD in and of itself can be a learning disability. Further, the psychiatric field tends to speak of classic learning disabilities as separate and distinct from ADHD; either co-occurring or not. Given the complexity of the brain when looking at ADHD with its attentional and memory issues, is there really a clear neurological distinction between ADHD and the aforementioned learning disabilities, or can it be that the often concurrent diagnosis of ADHD with learning disabilities is simply a more severe expression of the same condition?

Berney Wilkinson, PhDPosted on10:20 am - Jan 10, 2010

Great question Rod. In my experience, I have seen individuals with ADHD alone, Learning Disabilities alone, and ADHD with Learning Disabilities. Individuals in these groups seem to be distinct. That is, many individuals with Learning Disabilities that are not complicated by ADHD, seem to have the ability to focus, attend, and inhibit behaviors, unlike those with ADHD. Similarly, individuals with pure ADHD (uncomplicated by Learning Disabilities) tend to have little difficulty managing academic demands, when their ADHD symptoms are under control or adequately treated.

There are two issues, I believe, that contribute to your question. First, approximately 60% of individuals with untreated ADHD look like they have a Learning Disability. However, once the ADHD is appropriately treated, the true co-occurrence rate between ADHD and a Learning Disability is about 15% (according to some research). That 15%, the individuals with ADHD and a Learning Disability, tend to struggle greatly. They need significant support and treatment to perform at a level consistent with their peers. These individuals would tend to be prescribed medication for the ADHD as well as receive ESE services in school.

The other issue is most related to individuals who receive a diagnosis of ADHD or Learning Disability after elementary school (as a teenager or as an adult). As I mentioned in the original post, a correct diagnosis of ADHD is made only when symptoms have been present since the age of 7 years. Similarly, diagnoses of Learning Disabilities are typically made by the time the student is in the third grade. When a person is not diagnosed with either of these conditions until high school or adulthood, it can be extremely difficult to differentiate between “pure” ADHD and ADHD complicated by a Learning Disability. Let me give you an example. Say a person has undiagnosed ADHD-Inattentive Type. As a child, this person is not likely to get in trouble in class because he is not disruptive and is not the “squeaky wheel.” Therefore, he is unlikely to be referred for an evaluation to identify ADHD. Although his grades range from A’s to C’s, he makes it through elementary and middle school. All along, he notices that he has to work harder than his friends to pass his classes and he struggles with several courses, such as English (because of book reports and such) and Chemistry (just too much to remember). Nonetheless, he survives high school and hopes to go to college. Once he is in college, he continues to struggle, especially with his core courses (English, Algebra, and the sciences). Being a smart guy, he decides to talk with someone at the school to get help. The counselor refers him for testing, where it is found that he has a high average IQ and his basic academic skills are in the low average to average range. Short story, no learning disability. Upon further evaluation, his ADHD is discovered and he begins treatment. As he receives treatment for ADHD, his symptoms are managed, and he finds himself being able to better focus and concentrate. However, he is still having trouble in classes. The problem for this guy is not that he has a learning problem, it is that his ADHD went untreated for so long, that he has gaps in his academic skills. He knows enough and his intellectual abilities help him compensate well enough to perform at an average to low average level on certain types of academic tests (such as those administered in the evaluation); however, it is a completely different story when trying to meet classroom expectations, where speed, integration, and other demands are placed upon him. As such, in the classroom, this person may look and feel like he has a learning problem. In reality, however, his untreated ADHD left him with gaps in his educational foundation, making it very difficult for him to continue building his skills as he progresses through college.

Situations such as these happen quite often. I have seen this exact scenario dozens of times. It is very frustrating for the individual and we have to work together to develop strategies for managing class expectations and explore the potential for accommodations in the collegiate setting.

Looking back at my response to you, it was a long winded way to say that ADHD and Learning Disabilities are distinct conditions that, occasionally, have a similar appearance. It takes time and a thorough evaluation to differentiate between the two. When ADHD is a concern in my office, I conduct a psychoeducational and/or neuropsychological evaluation to ensure that the attention problems are not solely related to learning difficulties or some other issue (i.e., depression, social problems, anxiety, or issues with a teacher, parent, or spouse). It is my opinion that this type of evaluation is necessary to truly get to the root of the problem and discover ways to address the challenges.

Great question Rod and I hope that I answered your question.

Thanks for posting.

Dr. B

RodPosted on3:36 am - Jan 11, 2010

Thanks Berney. Your answer confirms what I have read in the extant literature and is close to my experience, although it seems to me that my learning disorders are for the most part distinct conditions. I suppose my curiosity about my diagnosis subsists because I was not told by (and did not ask) the school psychologist exactly what constitutes each of the three learning disorders that were classified as Not Otherwise Specified (NOS).

My difficulties with school appeared almost as early as my formal education began, in 2nd grade, which I repeated. The only memory I have of that time is being placed in some type of reading remediation program where I sat with headphones on alongside another student who appeared to be severely disabled; it was a disturbing experience that left me with one assumption — something is very wrong with me. Math became a major issue in 6th grade and continued thus until changing my major to speech communication while a college undergraduate. I barely satisfied the math requirement after more than one attempt. I do not have a specific memory of a writing difficulty apart from my handwriting being very poor, and in fact, I use block script to this day. In-class papers were often rushed or poorly composed; as long as I had unlimited time to write outside of class and did not procrastinate (of course), things were fine. Moreover, my experience is one of difficulty with getting information in and out. Although I have learned to accept and appreciate my brain style, having a remarkable grasp (in my head) of a given topic and not the ability to express it can really SUCK! Fortunately, therapy and off-label pharmacology have proven very, very beneficial. My experience confirms your findings; ADHD does not go away, it simply becomes less noticeable.

Is it possible to delineate from the assessments I was given as to where my learning disabilities show evidence of organic origin and where they are resultant of educations gaps? I was assessed using the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-III, Woodcock-Johnson III Tests of Cognitive Abilities, and Woodcock-Johnson III Tests of Achievement.

Berney Wilkinson, PhDPosted on4:02 pm - Jan 13, 2010

Thanks for sharing Rod. It sounds like you are more acutely aware of yourself than most people. That should help you considerably as you proceed down your path.

Your question regarding differentiation between organic origins and problems as a result of educational gaps is an interesting one that, of course, warrants the non-definitive response of “maybe.” I will try to use examples to demonstrate how they can be identified. Let’s look at mathematics. A person with a true “organic-based” math learning disability would have difficulty learning math, period. The person would not think mathematically and would have difficulty figuring out mathematical operations, even if given all of the time in the world. A person with educational gaps is typically able to figure out the problem, though they probably do not use the best method possible. Think of a kid just learning multiplication. Until that child has the multiplication tables memorized, he or she will likely resort to the long way of figuring out the answer, adding. This demonstrates that the child understands the math (not organic), but is missing the specific process (gaps). A child with an organic math disorder would likely have to memorize the multiplication tables and may never fully understand the principle behind the concept.

As with most things, this differentiation becomes more and more difficult as the individual gets older and learns different ways to solve problems. All of us develop strategies for doing things that we are not really good at. When this happens, it becomes difficult to differentiate between something that is organic from something that just needs remediation.

Hope that helps.

Dr. B

NOTE: For those of you out there who are wondering what organic means, we are referring to a brain-based condition. That is, having difficulty learning as a result of issues with the brain, rather than having never learned something.

RodPosted on5:20 pm - Feb 2, 2010

I find the American Psychiatric Association’s method of grouping/subtyping ADHD confusing if not misleading. If the core condition of ADHD is the inability to attend (i.e, inattentive), which is an issue of/the same as executive function, the seeming undervaluation of inattentive criterion in the hyperactive/impulsive type appears to imply that this subtype is not primarily a disorder of executive function/inattention. Heck, Tourette’s syndrome, Bipolar, and other conditions wherein attentional disorder often occurs, can also qualify for an ADHD subtype using this logic. Your thoughts, Berney?

Berney Wilkinson, PhDPosted on3:41 pm - Feb 5, 2010

It is my understanding that the APA will be restructuring ADHD in the upcoming and highly anticipated DSM-V. I agree with you regarding the hyperactive/impulsive type. In fact, I have mentioned in my classes before, that I have never seen a patient that would truly fit the hyperactive/impulsive subtype because if they are ADHD, they, in my mind, must have some attentional issues. If a person is only experiencing hyperactivity and impulsivity with no impact on attention, it sounds like a different condition to me.

Andrene WheelerPosted on8:02 pm - Mar 6, 2010

Dr B.,
What type of excercises can be practice at home to help a child stay focus and not be distracted especially when they are taking exams?

Berney Wilkinson, PhDPosted on9:20 am - Mar 9, 2010

It is very difficult for children to “practice” paying attention. Nonetheless, there are a few things that you can do to help. First, set up situations (i.e., reading, homework, etc.) where your child only has to work for a specified amount of time. The amount of time should be something that they can manage, attentionally. So, for example, you may ask your child to read for five minutes. You will want to do this a couple times a day (not back to back times) for several days. Then, as your child is interested in the book, etc., increase the time to six minutes. Slowly, over time, increase the time demands. This will help “train” your child’s attention. A second strategy, though similar to the first, would be to limit expectations based upon his/her attentional capacity. For example, it would be silly to expect your child to sit and read quietly for 15 minutes if they can only do so for five. Sometimes, schools will do this on tests for students who have a 504 Plan or an IEP.

Hope that helps.

Comments are closed.